In a groundbreaking study conducted by the Oxford Internet Institute (OII), researchers have found no evidence to support the widespread notion that the global expansion of Facebook is connected to significant psychological harm.
The study challenges the commonly held belief that social media platforms, including Facebook, have adverse effects on users’ mental well-being.
The research aimed to explore the changes in well-being across 72 countries as Facebook usage expanded, offering a fresh perspective on the contentious issue of social media’s impact on mental health.
The findings of the OII study go against the grain of public opinion and debates around the psychological effects of social media.
Researchers argue that the data they’ve compiled does not support the idea that increased saturation of social media in countries leads to deteriorating well-being among populations. Prof.
Andrew Przybylski, a key figure in the study, emphasized that the data analysis failed to establish a significant connection between Facebook’s proliferation and negative psychological consequences.
Read also: Facebook rebrands to appeal to young users again
Focusing on Facebook
The research exclusively focused on Facebook and did not extend its analysis to other platforms under Meta’s ownership, such as Instagram. Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has been under scrutiny due to concerns raised by whistleblowers and leaked information indicating that the company’s internal research acknowledged potential negative impacts on users.
Although the study provides a comprehensive overview of the national-level impact of Facebook usage on well-being, it does not account for the potential variations within specific user groups. The research might not capture the negative impacts experienced by smaller subsets of users if the overall effect is balanced by positive outcomes for others.
Additionally, the study did not delve into specific content-related risks, such as self-harm promotion, leaving room for further investigation into these areas.
A Call for Better Data Access
According to Prof. Przybylski, the primary policy lesson derived from the study is the need for researchers to have improved access to data from tech companies. He likened the current situation to “crying wolf” without having a proper “wolf detector,” highlighting the necessity of accurate and comprehensive data to inform decisions about the effects of social media on well-being.
The UK’s Online Safety Bill (OSB), currently in its final stages of becoming law, is designed to protect individuals from online harms.
However, experts like Prof. Sonia Livingstone from the London School of Economics caution that while the study’s critique of screen-time anxieties lacking robust evidence is valid, the study’s general scope may not provide substantial insights for ongoing regulatory debates. The OSB primarily targets the protection of children, a demographic not thoroughly examined in the study due to their limited use of Facebook.
Research Methodology and Findings
The research, conducted by Prof. Przybylski and co-author Matti Vuorre, was based on a significant dataset provided by Facebook. Both researchers maintained independence from the company, and the study received no funding from the tech giant.
Facebook shared data indicating user growth between 2008 and 2019 in various age brackets. The OII team compared this data with well-being information obtained from the Gallup World Poll Survey, representing nearly one million individuals. The results indicate that there is no substantial evidence linking the expansion of Facebook’s user base to a negative impact on psychological well-being.
Prof. Peter Etchells, a psychology and science communication expert from Bath Spa University, praised the study’s “broad strokes” approach. While acknowledging that the study did not establish causation, he emphasized its significance in underlining the value of technology companies collaborating with researchers.
The study’s use of internal data from a social media firm is a unique approach that could pave the way for more productive conversations between policymakers, parents, academics, and the tech industry.
Messenger returns to Facebook to improve privacy, user experience
Meta’s Response and Future Steps
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, welcomed the study as a “first of a kind” effort that utilized internal data from a social media platform. The company expressed hopes that the study would foster constructive dialogues among policymakers, parents, and academics, emphasizing the importance of a holistic understanding of user well-being for effective support.
As social media’s role in society continues to evolve, the study provides a thought-provoking perspective that challenges prevailing beliefs. The call for better access to data and the collaborative efforts of researchers and tech companies could play a pivotal role in shaping the future landscape of online platforms and their impact on mental health.